Rheumatology-Rhumatologie
10.2K views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
Scoop.it!

IL-6 inhibitors for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: past, present, and future - Online First - Springer

IL-6 inhibitors for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: past, present, and future - Online First - Springer | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it
 In this article, we review the mechanism of anti-IL-6 in the treatment of RA, provide the key efficacy
and safety data from clinical trials of approved anti-IL-6, TCZ, as well as six candidate IL-6 blockers
including sarilumab, ALX- 0061, sirukumab, MEDI5117, clazakizumab, and olo ...Cited by 1 Cite Save

Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, April 29, 2015 5:08 AM
IL-6 inhibitors for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: past, present, and futureGW Kim, NR Lee, RH Pi, YS Lim, YM Lee… - Archives of pharmacal …, 2015 - Springer...
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
Scoop.it!

IL-6 targeting mabs vs TNF targeting in rheumatoid arthritis: olokizumab, sarilumab, sirukumab -- Tanaka and Martin Mola 73 (9): 1595 -- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

IL-6 targeting mabs vs TNF targeting in rheumatoid arthritis: olokizumab, sarilumab, sirukumab -- Tanaka and Martin Mola 73 (9): 1595 -- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it

The safety and efficacy profiles in clinical trials of olokizumab, sarilumab and sirukumab are similar and are consistent with those observed in RA patients treated with tocilizumab. Furthermore, the clinical efficacy of these IL-6 inhibitors is similar to that of TNF inhibitors in patients with MTX-IR and TNF-IR. Screening of biomarkers or genetics in each RA patient, for instance, baseline serum levels of TNF and/or soluble IL-6R, may help to predict the efficacy of each drug and to select patients for cytokine-oriented targeted therapies.33 However, better strategies are warranted for selecting and identifying appropriate patients earlier once bDMARDs targeting IL-6 are launched in the near future. We also need to determine whether there are important differences between the many IL-6 inhibitors and which are suitable for particular patients, otherwise companies may waste time and money in development.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, August 8, 2014 7:03 PM

open access full text

 

RA  patients not responding to TNF inhibitors benefit from treatment with IL6 targeting mabs and show regression of RA disease.

 

 

Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1595-1597 doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205002

EditorialIL-6 targeting compared to TNF targeting in rheumatoid arthritis: studies of olokizumab, sarilumab and sirukumabYoshiya Tanaka1, Emilio Martin Mola2

+Author Affiliations

1The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan2Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid, SpainCorrespondence toProfessor Yoshiya Tanaka, The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan; tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jpReceived 31 January 2014Revised 23 April 2014Accepted 1 May 2014Published Online First 15 May 2014
Rescooped by Gilbert C FAURE from Top Selling Monoclonal Antibodies
Scoop.it!

Sirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody: a randomised, 2-part (proof-of-concept and dose-finding), phase II study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate...

Sirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody: a randomised, 2-part (proof-of-concept and dose-finding), phase II study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate... | Rheumatology-Rhumatologie | Scoop.it

Abstract

Objectives The safety and efficacy of sirukumab, an anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) monoclonal antibody, were evaluated in a 2-part, placebo-controlled phase II study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy.

Methods In Part A (proof-of-concept), 36 patients were randomised to placebo or sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) through week 10, with crossover treatment during weeks 12–22. In Part B (dose finding), 151 patients were randomised to sirukumab (100 mg q2w, 100 mg q4w, 50 mg q4w, or 25 mg q4w) through week 24, or placebo through week 10 with crossover to sirukumab 100 mg q2w (weeks 12–24). The proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response and the change from baseline in the 28-joint count disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) were determined. Safety was evaluated through week 38 in both parts.

Results The primary endpoint (ACR50 at week 12 in Part B) was achieved only with sirukumab 100 mg q2w versus placebo (26.7% vs 3.3%; p=0.026). Greater improvements in mean DAS28-CRP at week 12 were observed with sirukumab 100 mg q2w versus placebo in Parts A (2.1 vs 0.6, p<0.001) and B (2.2 vs 1.1; p<0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar for sirukumab-treated and placebo-treated patients through week 12 in Part A (70.6% and 63.2%, respectively) and B (67.8% and 66.7%, respectively). Infections were the most common type of AE; one death occurred (Part B, sirukumab 100 mg q2w, brain aneurysm).

Conclusions Sirukumab-treated patients experienced improvements in the signs/symptoms of RA. Safety results through 38 weeks were consistent with other IL-6 inhibitors.

Trial registration number NCT00718718.


Via Krishan Maggon
Krishan Maggon 's curator insight, August 8, 2014 9:43 PM

open access

 

Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1616-1625 doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205137

Clinical and epidemiological researchExtended reportSirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody: a randomised, 2-part (proof-of-concept and dose-finding), phase II study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapyJosef S Smolen1,2, Michael E Weinblatt3, Shihong Sheng4, Yanli Zhuang5, Benjamin Hsu6

+Author Affiliations

1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria2Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria3Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA4Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Quantitative Sciences, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Biologics Clinical Pharmacology, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Immunology, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USACorrespondence toProfessor Josef S Smolen, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna and 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, Vienna A-1090, Austria; josef.smolen@wienkav.atReceived 23 December 2013Revised 3 March 2014Accepted 6 March 2014Published Online First 3 April 2014